Face to Face Communication Versus Computer Mediated Communication

Face to Face colloquy versus calculator mediate Communication In the 21st century we are now support in, the rapid advancement of technology has completely changed our lives, especially the tools we use to communicate. In the olden days where snail mail is unmatched of the popular ship style in communicating, people would rather choose act tone to communicative expression because it is the only commission that could physically maintain their consanguinity as they ass see the facial expressions and body gestures destinen by the person who transmits the message to them.Even now, few people still prefer nervus to guinea pig interaction over figurer talk terms conference because of the lack of non verbal cues in computing machine arbitrate parley. However, with the invention of various computer arbitrate tools, people take hold eventually re leadd it with demonstrate to baptistry discourse with get along out them realizing because apparently the inventions of Facebook, Twitter, Skype and many more than serve a more handy platform for people to communicate.Windows 7 Check Your UnderstandingAlthough face to face intercourse is a better way to convey messages and feelings to each many other, computer talk terms communication makes our lives much easier. The prime(prenominal) variation that distinguishes between computer mediated communication and face to face communication is the effectiveness. Nowadays, nigh of us are very much depending on various social networking sites, for example the most common one- Facebook and Skype to enable us to communicate with people living on the other side of the orb and even those who live squiffy by.Using computer mediated communication for the purposes of interpersonal communication is a common tool for those who live a big distance away from one another, however multiple studies besides show that computer mediated communication is used to communicate with those who live close by or even among family members who live in the identical phratry (Stafford, Kine. & Dimmick, 1999, Wellman 2008). Besides that, computer mediated communication is effective in divergent tasks such as motif generation.Computer mediated communication tools, in like manner known as the group support system (GSS), provide a structured environment that allows participants in a collaborative team to interact simultaneously and anonymously to generate ideas, make decisivenesss and solve problems (Jessup, Canolly & Tansik 1990). The occasion why computer mediated communication is good in idea generation but not in decision making is that the dish of interacting through computer mediated communication might hinder the relationship between the sender and peckr due to the lack of non-verbal feedback and this go out credibly delay in decision making.The lack of non-verbal cues makes accurate perception of emotions demanding and receivers may attribute more neutral or negative meanings to messages than senders instead. Computer mediated communication lack of cues and that affect the content of the messages open firenot be communicate effectively and that channel is unnatural and less useful and efficient than face to face communication (Draft & Lengel, 1986 Kock, 2004 Kock, et. al 2008). By missing the cues, one bequeath not be able to fully understand what the other party is trying to communicate.Apart from that, face to face communication is in contented for some people who stay outlying(prenominal) or overseas to interact face to face with the party they wish to see. They will need to travel a long distance to turn over the other party who they want to convey the message to. However, it is effective in convergent tasks such as decision making. Face to face groups are better at decision making than computer mediated communication groups because they plunder more easily reach a consensus at the same time using immediate verbal and non-verbal feedback (Arch ee, 1993).Face to face discussion is faster and the feedback facilitated contain both visual and audio frequency cues compared to the slow computer mediated groups due to the lack of non-verbal feedback and the occurring of uncertainty at others reaction towards their opinions. Face to face remains the most powerful gracious interaction, never replace intimacy and immediacy of people conversing in the same room (Begley, 2004). In addition, computer mediated communication and face to face communication provide different communication speed to people.In computer mediated communication, the message delivery is faster by just sending e-mail or just typing inbox message. The speed and ease of typing slew the time taken in computer mediated interactions and ease the haul on group members. As a result, the message might last to deliver to the recipient. When the message is failed to deliver and users cannot depend on non-verbal cues, there is a high chance that the ambiguity will inc rease, thus creating opportunity for miscommunication.Therefore, it is not a good idea to send urgent messages through computer mediated communication because sometime the receiver might not find out his/ her mail frequently or the internet happens to be down will lead to miscommunication. Whereas for face to face communication, people need to arrange time to meet up with the person whom they want to convey the message to. This will actually delay the time for the meeting if they couldnt find a suitable time to match with each others schedule. The receivers can instant feedback with clear verbal and non-verbal cues.Face to face communication allows participants to accurately obtain both verbal and non-verbal of others. Subtle but important nuances such as voice inflections, hand gestures and facial expressions just dont nonplus across in an email message (McFerran, 2010). People will receive the feedback from the receiver on the spot without waiting for days and months. This is a lso enables the participants to define their communication according to the feedback. There is also a big difference in the equal aspect between face to face communication and computer mediated communication.People save the cost and effort of travelling and pull together everyone in the same place at the same time. They can amour each other by using computer mediated programs such as Skype, Facebook, Twitter and so on. Skype is also one of the computer mediated programs that allows face to face communication by using the webcam function. People can see each other and interact by using the occupation of Skype. Therefore, those who stay far away from each other and wish to consume face to face interaction, they can communicate using Skype which provides both interaction in one shot.Moreover, computer mediated communication has also do one of the most cost effective ways of dealing aires such as online boutique, online shopping store, online booking and so on. This enables tho se online companies to save the monthly fees such as rental fees, the salary for employees, water and electricity bills and so on. Additionally, customers can also order or comment about the services or products of those online companies via email. This is convenient for both the customers and also the companies as the companies will know the feedback provided by the customers by just checking their mailbox.For instance, the company can save the travelling cost for business purpose as they can reply their customers feedback through email. This shows that implementing computer mediated communication systems in organization will mainly enhance the strength and cost. Besides, it is costly for those people who want to travel to a certain place if they want to meet with his or her friends, family or even relatives. It requires expensive higher cost of travelling fees such as bus ticket , taxi fees, airline ticket and so on especially during those important festivals or celebrations.Fur thermore, this is also time consuming and causing the person to be wash up throughout the long journey if he or she stays far away from the destination. Also, the person who conducts the business using face to face communication will need to pay for the business travelling fees. According to the newspaper publisher by Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, most of the people inform their companies establish instituted business travel restrictions, including limitations on the frequency of travel (57%), on the cost of airline tickets (57%) and in accommodation (51%).This shows that face to face communication causes a large beat of cost for the business travelling and thats the reason why the company implements this kind of restriction. Nevertheless, face to face communication even causes people to spend the cost more the actual amount they have to pay to. For example, if there is something missed out during the gathering or meeting, the person must travel to meet up again an d this requires cost and time. This might caused a big impact if that is an important issues missed out during the meeting with the client from other country who carries an important business for the company.Also, the most important is it is hard to arrange the time to meet up as it is hard to match with each others schedule. The business cannot conduct smoothly and it will indirectly affect the performance of the company. In a nutshell, face to face interaction and computer mediated communication have their own benefits and majority of the people has known it. However, undoubtedly, computer mediated communication has already replaced face to face interaction without anybody realizing and its the most convenient tool to communicate with each other.Although it is hard to deny that face to face is also an alternative way for humans communication, computer mediated communication has becoming more and more powerful and yet to be the major tool for our communication purpose. Thats why pe ople today often communicate using computer mediated communication which is an easiest way to stay connected with each other no matter who come from different part of the world. References An,Y-J. & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in opposite courses.Journal of computer-mediated communication. Vol. 11 (2) Bordia,P. (1997, January). Face-to-face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication A Synthesis of the observational Literature. Journal of Business Communication. Vol. 34 (1) Lee. C. (2010). Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communication Exploring Employees Preference of efficacious Employee Communication Channel. International Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts. Vol. 1 (2) Mc. Ferran. J (2010, November 12). Face to Face Communication Still Best style to Get Job Done.In Winnipeg Free Press. Retrieved February 25,2013, from http//www. winnipegfreepress. com/business/face-to-face-communication-still-best-way- to-get-job-done-111714554. html Managing Across infinite in Todays Economic Climate The value of face-to-face communication. In Harvard Business Review. Retrieved February 25, 2013. From http//hbr. org/hbr-main/resources/pdfs/marketing/15426_HBRAS_BA_Report. pdf Perry, M. (2010, April). Face-to-face Versus Computer Mediated Communication Couples Satisfaction and Experience Across Conditions ( Masters Thesis)